Cover letter optics express, osa | author resource center
The cover letter and manuscript abstract will be evaluated by at least two editorial board members to determine if the paper is approved for external peer review. Should a reviewer receive a manuscript at a time when circumstances preclude prompt attention to it, he or she should decline through the online peer review system immediately, and discard any hard copies of the manuscript that have been printed. Questions about Optica can be directed to the editorial staff at optica osa.
Mini-reviews typically will be invited, but authors may contact the Editor-in-Chief to suggest a potential topic if they wish to submit such a paper. Cover Letter and Editorial Review A word submission cover letter is required for all research letters and research articles.
At this stage, submissions are also screened for plagiarism using Similarity Check. A review should be as constructive and helpful as possible; in no case is subjective personalized criticism appropriate in a review.
Open Access Information
OSA has developed a brochure that provides an overview of the objectives and steps for reviewing a scientific manuscript with best practices for ensuring a constructive and ethical review of scientific research. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.
Review by external referees is required for acceptance of all research articles, review papers, tutorials, discussion papers, comments and replies. Becoming a reviewer can take some time. Comments and Replies will also be published.
Developmental editing will be performed as necessary on accepted manuscripts to ensure broad accessibility for the paper.
Should a reviewer receive a manuscript at a time when circumstances preclude prompt attention to it, he or she should decline through the online peer review system immediately, and discard any hard copies of the manuscript that have been printed. Providing a good review that is thorough and fair can be time-consuming and the editors appreciate the energy that reviewers devote to the task.
The editor's attention should also be directed by the reviewer to perceived fragmentation of publication by the author s. Any suggestions for alternate reviewers at this time would be very helpful. Editors select appropriate reviewers for each paper based not only on expertise keywords, but also on information such as publication records, prior reviewing experience or personal knowledge and recommendations.
If you do speak with a reporter in that time, the information may only appear in the press after the embargo is lifted on the day of publication. If you will be presenting come si scrive curriculum vitae work after we have notified you that your paper has been chosen to receive promotion to the media however, please let us know.
Every effort will be made to provide a final manuscript decision in a timely manner. The acceptance criteria for Optica are as follows: A reviewer should act promptly, submitting a report in a timely manner.
The author will submit a request to the editorial staff at optica osa. In that event, the reviewer maintains responsibility for ensuring confidentiality. OSA has provided step-by-step overview of the peer review process for a typical manuscript.
Do not respond to or reach out to reporters without contacting us first. This process will be integrated into Prism beginning in June OSA editors filter submissions and strongly discourage resubmitting rejected manuscripts to other OSA journals, except by invitation from the editors.
OSA | Author Resource Center: Overview of Peer Review
During review, the manuscript should neither be shown to nor discussed with others except, in special cases, to persons from whom specific advice may be sought. Here are some other tips to increase your chances of being asked to review: Accept without revision How to conclude an essay with a quote acceptance, minor revisions requested Revisions requested prior to final decision Reject, transfer option or resubmission processed as a new manuscript Reject, decline further consideration If the associate editor rejects the paper after peer review but deems it appropriate for further consideration by OSA, the author will receive a decision letter that offers a limited-time option to transfer the paper with peer reviews to another OSA Journal.
If you are approached by a reporter, or your institution wants to feature your work, please contact us so that we can coordinate outreach prior to or on the publication date. A reviewer should recognize that a manuscript under review is a confidential document.
As a result, the process for paper acceptance is inherently highly selective.
A chosen reviewer who feels inadequately qualified to judge the research reported in a cover letter for resume for bookstore should do the same. Again, any alternate reviewer suggestions would be most appreciated. Note that a paper is considered "incremental" if it does not convincingly add new and important results to the field.
An overview of the production process can be found by clicking here. Reviewers should explain and support their judgment adequately so that editors and authors may understand the basis of their comments.
OSA | Author Resource Center
Information for Authors If your paper is chosen to receive media coverage, you will be notified as soon as possible during the review process, usually just after a decision has been rendered. On occasion, the editors may receive pertinent information to justify re-evaluation of a paper after it has been accepted.
If in doubt, the reviewer should decline promptly, advising the editor of the possible conflict of interest. All submissions must be made electronically using the Prism article tracking system.
- Moi university thesis writing guidelines what do you title an annotated bibliography, essay on the day at school
Generally, the authors' response and the original review comments will be provided for re-review. If the editorial board declines the paper for Optica at the initial review stage but deems the paper appropriate for further consideration by OSA publications, the author will receive a decision letter that offers a limited-time option to transfer the paper to another OSA Journal.
The new Editor will accept or decline the transfer request.
Author & Reviewer Resource Center
Reviewers provide comments aimed to help create a better manuscript. Optica publishes original research letters 4 pagesresearch articles pagesand mini-reviews pages.
The reviewer should inform the editor of others who make significant contributions to a review. Creating and updating your account in our system is just the first step. This document outlines each step of the peer review process from the time an author submits a paper to a final manuscript decision.